Tag
Reports are only useful if someone reads them to the end. These prompts help you turn raw updates or numbers into a summary that's structured, scannable, and to the point.
15 prompts · page 2 of 2
Name the research topic, the sources to draw on, the focus areas you need covered, and the intended audience, and this prompt turns a stack of research into one readable summary. - A 3-5 sentence executive summary - Key findings as bullets, plus the methodologies behind them - Conflicting viewpoints and gaps in the research, flagged explicitly - Practical implications, citations, and further-reading suggestions
Paste the raw statistical results — p-values, confidence intervals, effect sizes, coefficients — along with who you're presenting to, and this prompt converts them into language an executive audience can actually use. It produces a 3-sentence jargon-free executive summary, a "so what" section spelling out what should change because of the numbers, a plain-language confidence statement instead of "p < 0.05," a magnitude analogy that makes the effect intuitive, honest caveats, and a description of one chart that would communicate the finding.
Paste in raw analysis results — tables, statistics, key findings — along with the audience, tone, and target length, and this prompt builds a narrative instead of a results dump. It opens with the original question, walks through evidence in logical order, builds toward the insight rather than front-loading it, addresses the obvious counterarguments, and closes with a recommendation and confidence level, marking where charts should sit with [CHART: description] tags.
Paste 5-8 key findings with their supporting numbers, the reader's role, and what prompted the analysis, and this prompt turns them into a summary an executive will actually read. - One-paragraph bottom line stating the single most important takeaway - 3-5 findings, each with a concrete "so what" implication - Specific recommended actions, not vague advice like "invest more" - Honest risks, caveats, and suggested next-step analysis - All jargon-free and kept under 500 words
Provide a finalized theme name, its component codes, and 2-3 example passages, and this prompt drafts the 150-200 word description that theme needs in a results section. It states the analytical claim the theme is making rather than just naming its topic, ties that claim back to the codes underneath it, and suggests what kind of illustrative quotes would best support it — run once per theme, then assemble the outputs in order.
Paste in one analysis summary — the findings and recommendations — and this prompt rewrites it three times for three depths of reader. - A 200-word C-suite version: bottom line and decision, no methodology - A 500-word manager version: team-level implications and actions - An 800-word analyst version: full methodology and limitations - All three carry the same core insight at different depth and vocabulary