Applies an existing qualitative coding framework to a new interview transcript instead of building codes from scratch.
- Inputs: a set of codes with definitions, plus the transcript text
- For each code: locates every relevant passage and quotes it directly
- Fits: deductive coding work where the framework is already established
- Pairs with a codebook-matching prompt when uncoded passages also need catching
Turns a research question, study topic, and participant description into a ready-to-use interview guide before fieldwork starts.
- Generates 8-12 open-ended questions ordered from general to specific
- Builds in at least two probing follow-ups for topics that tend to get surface-level answers
- Avoids yes/no phrasing and leading wording
- Best piloted with one participant before the full study
Scans a full interview transcript for everything one participant said about a single named topic, quoting directly wherever possible instead of paraphrasing, and flags any conflicting or nuanced responses on that topic. Useful for building a topic-by-topic view across multiple transcripts before formal coding begins, rather than reading full summaries each time.
Paste a raw interview transcript to get a first-pass inductive code list
before any themes are decided.
- Builds a granular code list rather than pre-collapsed themes
- Each code gets a short 2-5 word label
- Each code gets a one-sentence definition
- Each code is paired with a direct illustrative quote from the transcript
Paste in the flat code list from an earlier coding pass and this prompt
organizes it into 3-6 coherent themes for a qualitative results write-up.
Each theme gets a descriptive name that makes an analytical claim rather
than just labeling a topic, a list of the component codes that belong to
it, and a 2-3 sentence description of what the theme actually argues,
while pushing back on single-code themes unless there's a strong reason
for one.
Supply an existing codebook built from earlier interviews plus a fresh
transcript, and this prompt codes the new interview against it.
- Passages matching established codes get quoted and labeled
- Passages that don't fit any existing code are surfaced separately
- New candidate code labels are suggested for those unmatched passages
- Useful for spotting codebook drift when too many new codes keep appearing
Paste a draft set of interview questions to sanity-check before running
them with real participants.
- Flags leading language in each question
- Flags ambiguity and structural problems
- Offers a revised version alongside every critique
- Pairs well as a review pass after drafting an interview guide
Paste in a raw interview transcript and this prompt produces a fast
first-pass summary before any formal coding work begins. It pulls out 3-5
main themes discussed, 3-5 verbatim key quotes from the participant, a
read on the participant's overall stance toward the research topic, and
any unusual or unexpected perspectives that don't fit neatly into the
theme bullets — useful for quickly deciding whether a transcript warrants
a deeper coding pass.
Give the specific decision or question this summary needs to inform,
plus the interview transcript, and get back a 200-word-or-shorter
condensation.
Prioritizes actionable findings tied directly to that decision over vague
generalities, and favors concrete specifics — useful when a stakeholder
needs the gist of an interview in under a minute of reading.