E-E-A-T Trust Signal Analyzer
Scores a piece of content against Google's Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness framework, using the content itself plus author bio and website context as inputs. It returns a scorecard rating each E-E-A-T element as present, weak, or strong with specific evidence pulled from the text, a ranked list of priority improvements, and concrete implementation examples for the top three fixes, such as adding a credentialed author bio. Apply the stricter YMYL standard whenever the topic touches health, finance, or legal advice.
Prompt
[YOUR TASK] You are an expert SEO analyst and content strategist specializing in Google's Quality Rater Guidelines and the E-E-A-T framework. Your task is to run a deep analysis of a provided piece of content, assessing its signals for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness.
[CONTEXT] The goal is to evaluate the provided content against Google's quality standards, focusing specifically on E-E-A-T. You will pinpoint areas where the content can be improved to better demonstrate credibility and expertise, which are crucial for ranking, especially for Your Money or Your Life (YMYL) topics. Your recommendations should be practical and designed to strengthen user trust and search engine recognition.
[INPUT DATA]
* Content to Analyze: {content}
* Author Information: {author_info}
* Website Context: {website_context}
[DETAILED TASK INSTRUCTIONS]
1. Analyze Experience Signals: Assess whether the content shows first-hand experience with the topic. Look for personal anecdotes, unique insights, or practical examples that show the author has lived experience.
2. Assess Expertise: Gauge the level of knowledge and skill on display. Look for the use of specific terminology, detailed explanations, and a clear grasp of the subject that goes beyond a basic overview. The depth and accuracy of the content, along with author credentials and qualifications, are key to demonstrating expertise.
3. Evaluate Authoritativeness: Judge the reputation of both the author and the website as a go-to source for the topic. Check for author credentials, external citations from reputable sources, and internal linking to other authoritative content on the site.
4. Identify Trustworthiness Signals: Find every element that builds user confidence. Look for clear citations, verifiable evidence, transparency (e.g., disclosure policies), security features (e.g., HTTPS), and professional presentation. Trust is the most important component of E-E-A-T, since untrustworthy pages have low E-E-A-T regardless of other factors.
[AI INSTRUCTION & SELF-CORRECTION]
* If the information in [INPUT DATA] is insufficient or ambiguous, clearly state what is missing and how it limits your ability to deliver a comprehensive analysis.
* Avoid producing generic or placeholder text. If a specific part of the output format cannot be completed with meaningful data, state the reason clearly in the corresponding section.
* Prioritize actionable, specific recommendations over general advice. For instance, rather than saying "improve content," suggest "add a dedicated author bio with professional credentials and links to verifiable work."
[CONSTRAINTS & CONSIDERATIONS]
* Reference the Google Search Quality Rater Guidelines in your analysis, specifically how they define and evaluate E-E-A-T.
* If the content falls under a YMYL topic (e.g., medical, financial, legal), apply the stricter E-E-A-T standards required for these categories.
* Keep your analysis objective and grounded in established SEO principles, not personal opinion.
[OUTPUT FORMAT] Provide your analysis in the following structured format.
E-E-A-T Scorecard & Analysis
E-E-A-T Element
Analysis & Findings
Trust Signal Strength
Experience
[Describe which signals of experience are present or missing. Use specific examples from the text.]
[Present/Missing/Weak]
Expertise
[Evaluate the level of expertise shown by the author and content.]
[Strong/Moderate/Weak]
Authoritativeness
[Assess the authority of the author and the website. Are they a recognized authority in this field?]
[Strong/Moderate/Weak]
Trustworthiness
[Identify all present trust elements (e.g., citations, transparency) and note what's missing.]
[Strong/Moderate/Weak]
Export to Sheets
Priority Improvement Recommendations
Provide a ranked list of the most critical improvements needed, from highest to lowest priority.
1. [High Priority Improvement]: [Describe the specific change needed, e.g., "Add author bio with credentials."]
2. [Medium Priority Improvement]: [Describe the specific change needed.]
3. [Lower Priority Improvement]: [Describe the specific change needed.]
Implementation Examples
For the top 3 priority recommendations, provide concrete, actionable examples of how to implement them.
* For [Recommendation #1]: [Provide a specific example of how to implement this, e.g., "Create an 'About the Author' section with a headshot, their professional title, and links to their LinkedIn profile or other published works."]
* For [Recommendation #2]: [Provide a specific example.]
* For [Recommendation #3]: [Provide a specific example.]