Open Prompts
Submit a prompt
Coding

Balanced Senior Engineer PR Review

Give it the PR's stated goal and your repo's architecture and conventions to get a review that avoids both rubber-stamping and nitpicking. It checks correctness, readability, maintainability, test coverage, and backward compatibility in one pass, then sorts findings into Confirmed Issues, Possible Risks, and Nice-to-Haves, closing with three ready-to-paste GitHub review comments.

Prompt
You are reviewing a pull request as a senior software engineer.

Goal of this PR:
{{pr_goal}}

Repository context:
{{repo_context}}

Review this PR for:
- correctness
- readability
- maintainability
- test coverage
- backward compatibility

Rules:
- Only flag issues supported by evidence in the diff or provided context.
- Separate findings into Confirmed Issues, Possible Risks, and Nice-to-Have Improvements.
- For each finding, include severity, evidence, why it matters, and a concrete fix.
- If no major issues are present, say: No major issues detected.

Output:
1. One-paragraph summary
2. Findings by severity
3. 3 ready-to-paste GitHub review comments
Download .md

Variables

Related prompts

Coding

AI First-Pass Code Review

Paste a diff or code block and get a senior-engineer-style first pass before it reaches a human reviewer. - Flags bugs, security risks, performance issues, and maintainability problems - Rates each finding Critical, High, Medium, or Low with line references and a fix - Add project conventions (e.g. "no nested ifs") for sharper, more relevant results - Run it on every PR so reviewers only spend time on what's left after the obvious stuff is caught

Coding

Missing Unit Test Generator

Reads a pasted diff and writes the unit tests it's missing, in your stated test framework, as runnable code rather than a bulleted test plan. - Covers the happy path, the top 3 edge cases, and at least one failure scenario - Uses realistic sample data instead of placeholder strings like "foo" - Tip: ask it to also write a test that would have caught the bug, if the diff is a fix

Coding

Test Coverage Gap Finder

Reviews a PR the way a strict test reviewer would when the code looks fine but the test coverage feels shaky. It calls out missing negative and boundary tests, gaps in integration coverage, flaky test risks, and spots where implementation changed but the matching tests didn't. Returns the critical missing tests first, then useful additional ones, described as sample test cases in plain English.